Licence Optimisation for Price-Rise Season: Finding and Closing Unused Subscriptions

Software subscriptions grow silently by nature: each starts as a small monthly amount, attaches to the card's auto-charge and is forgotten. Then January arrives — currency updates, plan increases, "our prices are changing" emails — and accounting walks into management with five price letters in one week. That week is the year's most productive IT exercise: before debating the increased budget, see how much of it is actually used.

Step 1: the Full Inventory — the Statement Method

The most reliable source of a subscription inventory is not memory but the money trail: scan the last three months of card statements and incoming invoices; write every software/service item onto one list — who bought it, which card it charges, how many seats, annual or monthly. This sweep surfaces two surprises in almost every business: a subscription nobody remembers, and two tools doing the same job. For shadow items (accounts departments opened on their own), the shadow-IT sweep completes this step.

Step 2: Seat-to-Usage Mapping

One question per tool in the inventory: does the licence count equal the active-user count? Modern admin panels show last-login dates; a seat untouched for 60–90 days is a closure candidate. The mapping's classic finding is licences forgotten on departed employees — the leak accumulates in every business whose offboarding list lacks a "transfer/close licences" line. The second finding is the "just in case" seats: a ten-user package bought three years ago for a five-person team, because "we'll grow".

Step 3: the Duplicate-Function Hunt

Common duplication	Typical cause	The deciding question
Two project/task tools	Departments chose separately	Which becomes the company standard?
Three cloud storage services	Ecosystem + habit + a legacy account	Where is the file's one home?
Tools already inside the suite	A function included in M365/Workspace bought again separately	Who actually knows what the current suite covers?
Meeting/communication sprawl	Customer habits	Can the internal standard be one, with external participation flexible?

The third row wins most often: separate subscriptions are paid for storage, meetings, forms and automation that the existing office suite already includes. One serious read of the suite's contents can retire several subscriptions in a single line.

Step 4: Tier Optimisation

Buying everyone the top plan is decision fatigue expressed as budget. The right pattern is mixed: the top tier for the core users who genuinely use the advanced features, the standard plan for everyone else — the user-profile approach applies to every tool. The panels' usage reports (who uses which feature) lift this decision out of guesswork.

Step 5: Renewal Decisions — Answering the Price Letter

With the cleanup done, you sit at the renewal table holding the real-needs list. Three levers: annual payment (a visible discount in most tools; the price is commitment — careful on seats that might shrink), tier/seat negotiation (talk to the vendor at annual renewal, especially when reducing seats) and alternatives (if the price gap has opened, consider migrating — but priced together with the migration cost; an expensive move to a cheap tool is the classic trap). For currency-denominated items, decide together with the budget's FX scenario.

The Lasting Win: the Gate Rule, Not the Cleanup

Doing this once rescues one budget; to avoid repeating it every January, two rules become permanent: a new-subscription approval step (whoever wants it, no card attaches before inventory registration and a duplication check) and a licence line at offboarding. With those two gates working, the subscription inventory stays current by itself, and price letters become routine budget inputs instead of panic.

A Licence Sweep with Yamanlar Bilişim

For customers under a maintenance agreement, the subscription inventory is already kept alive; in price season we arrive with the seat-usage report and the duplication findings ready. For businesses wanting an independent sweep, the exercise is a one-off service: statement analysis, panel reports, closure/merge recommendations and the gate rules installed.

FAQ